We use cookies to improve your experience and for marketing. View our Cookie Policy for more information.
7 min

AI in Finance Needs Accountability

Author
Joel Wägmark
Published
March 24, 2026
Last Update
September 3, 2026

Key takeaways

  1. The article's core tension is that modern AI models are probabilistic, while finance work is deterministic and needs outputs that are auditable, reproducible, and traceable.
  2. Reliable data is not enough: AI also has to work within the company's rules, with a clear record of how it reached a recommendation, or the output will not pass an audit or attract a personal sign-off.
  3. If treasury policies — such as liquidity buffers, counterparty exposure caps, and payment approval thresholds — are machine-readable, agents can reference them, escalate when something falls outside policy, and be reviewed against the same document.
  4. Audit trails should record the data queried, the policy clause referred to, and who approved the result; role-based access controls apply equally to the AI, so it cannot access data or suggest actions the user could not.
  5. Atlar's agents currently handle cash positioning, payment reviews, and reconciliation, with forecasting coming soon; they operate within user-defined policies, log every execution, and surface results for human review.

In our last post, we covered why a lot of AI tools in finance have underwhelmed up to now, and that reliable data is the starting point. There's a second challenge, though, and it's more fundamental: AI is probabilistic, and finance work is deterministic.

Modern AI models don't follow rigid, predefined rules. They often produce different outputs given similar inputs, and can't fully explain how they got there. This sits in obvious tension with finance work, where every output needs to be auditable, reproducible, and traceable.

Who signs off?

Finance teams work under strict compliance frameworks like SOX, IFRS, GAAP, and internal controls. They may appear abstract, but in fact boil down to personal accountability: the CFO signs off on the annual report; treasurers are personally responsible for liquidity; controllers own accuracy. Before relying on AI for material decisions, a finance professional has to ask: can I stake my career on this?

Reliable data makes the output more accurate, which helps, but only gets you part of the way. You also need to know that the AI is working within your company's rules, and you need a clear record of how it got to the recommendation. Without that, the output won't pass an audit, nor would anyone be willing to put their name to it.

The treasury policy

No one is suggesting finance teams should avoid AI altogether; the controls just need to catch up.

Most teams follow some sort of corporate treasury policy, whether that's a formal document or a set of vaguely agreed-upon assumptions. They can be pretty specific: minimum liquidity buffers, counterparty exposure caps, payment approval thresholds. They also tend to live in a PDF somewhere, enforced manually and only verified after the fact.

Now, imagine if these policies were machine-readable. AI agents can reference them when recommending actions, and the reviewer can validate the agent's decision-making against the same policy. When something falls outside policy, the agent escalates to the reviewer rather than proceeding. The treasury policy becomes a set of rules that AI is held accountable to, not just a document that humans are expected to remember.

All of this depends on the AI having the right context. A treasury policy that caps counterparty exposure at 15% is only enforceable if the AI can see your full position across every bank and entity. Which is why AI in finance has to start with data and connectivity.

Configuring an AI agent with treasury policies in Atlar.

The audit chain

If the treasury policy governs what AI can recommend, the audit chain governs how those recommendations are tracked, reviewed, and approved.

Audit trails record the full sequence: what data was queried, which clause in the treasury policy the AI referred to, and who approved the result. Approval chains enforce how many people review it, and at what thresholds.

Role-based access controls, applied equally to the AI, ensure it can't access data or suggest actions that the user themselves wouldn't be able to access or perform. The result is a chain of accountability you can query at any point, rather than having to reconstruct when an auditor comes knocking. Reliable data is what makes AI in finance useful; the roles, approvals, policy enforcement, and audit trails around it are what make it trustworthy.

Autonomy requires accountability

Counter-intuitively, AI is pushing finance teams back towards first principles around transparency and accountability. Using it correctly forces teams to think carefully about their policies and documentation, because the AI operates within them.

AI can also flag where actual behaviour is diverging from stated policy, even spotting trends before a direct policy contradiction occurs. If your investment policy says maximum 90-day maturities but a growing share of recent placements are pushing close to that limit, you'd want to know before the next board meeting. Continuous policy monitoring like this is hard to do manually, but natural for AI with access to the underlying data.

Getting the constraints right is what allows AI to move beyond isolated tasks and handle entire workflows. In practice, an agent working end to end would:

  1. Reference the treasury policies relevant to the task
  2. Access the relevant data, subject to its own data permissions and those of the user
  3. Log every data query and task execution in the audit trail
  4. Trigger approval chains at preset thresholds
  5. Flag any policy violations or risks as they arise
  6. Surface the result for a human to review

The reviewer can accept the recommendation or trace back through every step that led to it. Finance teams define the rules and stay in control, while the repetitive execution shifts to the AI. This frees teams to focus on the decisions that actually require human judgment, which is AI’s core promise.

See it in action

At Atlar, our agents handle cash positioning, payment reviews, and reconciliation, with forecasting coming soon. They operate within user-defined policies, log every execution, and surface results for human review.

If you're interested in seeing how our customers use Atlar's AI today, and what the future looks like, request a demo with our team.

The Atlar dashboard shown on an iPad.
AI in Atlar runs on the full breadth of your treasury data.
Joel Wägmark
Drawing on his background in payments at Tink, Joel leads product and finance at Atlar, building reliable, productized bank connectivity platforms.

Frequently asked questions

Why does the article say AI sits in tension with finance work?

Modern AI models do not follow rigid, predefined rules, often produce different outputs given similar inputs, and cannot fully explain how they got there. Finance work needs every output to be auditable, reproducible, and traceable. That is a problem for professionals who sign off under frameworks such as SOX, IFRS, GAAP, and internal controls, because they have to ask whether they can stake their career on the result.

What role should the treasury policy play?

Most teams already follow a corporate treasury policy, whether a formal document or loosely agreed assumptions, covering items such as minimum liquidity buffers, counterparty exposure caps, and payment approval thresholds. Those policies often live in a PDF and are enforced manually after the fact. If they are machine-readable, agents can reference them when recommending actions, reviewers can validate decisions against the same policy, and the agent escalates rather than proceeding when something falls outside policy.

Why does policy enforcement still depend on connectivity?

A policy is only enforceable if the AI can see the full position. The article's example is a counterparty exposure cap of 15%, which cannot be applied unless the AI can see the company's position across every bank and entity. That is why the piece argues AI in finance has to start with data and connectivity.

What belongs in the audit chain?

Audit trails should record the full sequence: what data was queried, which clause in the treasury policy the AI referred to, and who approved the result. Approval chains enforce how many people review it and at what thresholds. Role-based access controls, applied equally to the AI, ensure it cannot access data or suggest actions the user themselves would not be able to access or perform.

What can Atlar's agents do today under this model?

They handle cash positioning, payment reviews, and reconciliation, with forecasting coming soon. In the end-to-end model described, an agent would reference relevant policies, access permitted data, log every query and execution, trigger approval chains at preset thresholds, flag policy violations or risks, and surface the result for a human to review. The reviewer can accept the recommendation or trace back through every step.

Get fresh insights, monthly.

You can unsubscribe anytime.

Read more

June 4, 2026
AI

Notes from the CFO AI Summit 2026

Podimo, Europe's largest podcasting platform, is partnering with Atlar to manage cash, payments, and forecasting—all integrated with Business Central.

February 11, 2026
AI

Introducing AI Agents for Treasury

Atlar is launching AI agents for treasury: autonomous workflows for cash positioning, payments, reconciliation, and forecasting, built on the full breadth of your financial data.

February 6, 2026
AI

AI in Finance Lacks Data and Tools

AI in finance needs more than smart models. Atlar co-founder and CPO Joel Wägmark explains why connectivity and execution are the real bottleneck.

See Atlar in action.

Enter your work email to watch a live product demo.

Work Email
Phone Number (Optional)
Thanks, you will receive an invite email soon.
Oops, something went wrong. Try again with your work email.